I'm not quite sure how to explain your results. Even more so that 1044 works and 1045 doesn't. The changes that were made in 1045 have no relationship to the file exist rules or directly to the ftp engine.
Without seeing the complete ftp session log it would be extremely hard to make any determinations on exactly what went wrong.
When you used 1044 was it necessary to resume the file after the 4GB mark?
Perhaps the ftp server doesn't correctly handle resuming a download over 4GB from a position greater than 4GB.. This has been known to be true in the past with several ftp servers.
|
Threaded Mode