Go Back   FlashFXP Forums > > >

Bug Reports Report bugs here.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-11-2004, 02:51 AM   #5
paddy
Junior Member
FlashFXP Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by bigstar
When you enabled Alternative FXP did the direction of the PASV <> PORT commands reverse?
Yes, it did. But the response were the same.

Quote:
My thought was that profxp did things backwards compared to FlashFXP. My reason for this was because of the PASV reply. One reply ends with a period and the other doesn't. I took this as a sign of two different ftp servers returning the PASV reply.
Well.. it does something else, thats for sure. One difference is that FlashFXP is running behind a fw and profxp aint.. but my understanding of FXP is that my client doesnt bother about communication between the two servers ?

Quote:
One site allowing PORT and the other not allowing it.
Both support both PASV and PORT mode.. atleast for direct down-/up -loading.

Been trying a few different ftp-servers and from what I can get is the following:
  • proftpd <-> proftpd = no go
  • proftpd <-> raidenftpd = no go
  • proftpd <-> glftpd = no go
  • proftpd <-> vsftpd = no go
  • proftpd <-> g6ftpserver = works both ways
  • glftpd <-> glftpd = works both ways

I find this pretty strange ? What really amazes me is that the g6ftpserver worked .. becouse that one is aculy behind a fw seen from the proftpd's side..

I can setup a lab for you if you would like to debug something.. PM me in that case.
paddy is offline  
 

Tags
flashfxp, ftp, type, [103332], [l]


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 PM.

Parts of this site powered by vBulletin Mods & Addons from DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Details)