ioFTPD General New releases, comments, questions regarding the latest version of ioFTPD. |
06-06-2004, 09:59 AM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 231
|
active_ports
pasv_ports
instead of only pasv.
Io is still unusable on a firewalled connection without this... 1 port simply isnt enough for active in those special cases
|
|
|
06-06-2004, 10:52 AM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 289
|
Mouton => The Full Duplex and The Half Duplex
HD (Half Duplex) already supported but not FD (Full Duplex)
http://www.commentcamarche.net/trans...transmode.php3 (in french)
do you understand ?
and new feature for hide or crypted the ip
|
|
|
06-06-2004, 01:42 PM
|
#18
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Beta Tester ioFTPD Scripter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 517
|
half-duplex or full-duplex is an network card setting, it has nothing to do with ioFTPD
|
|
|
06-06-2004, 07:43 PM
|
#19
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 289
|
FD is activated on the network card but I think that ioFTPD support not that
|
|
|
06-07-2004, 07:37 AM
|
#20
|
Posse Member
Ultimate Scripter ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,956
|
It sure does allow the full NIC capacity to be used. In both directions, at the same time.
|
|
|
06-07-2004, 07:40 AM
|
#21
|
Posse Member
Ultimate Scripter ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,956
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Unique
active_ports
pasv_ports
instead of only pasv.
Io is still unusable on a firewalled connection without this... 1 port simply isnt enough for active in those special cases
|
Doesn't the ftp rfc states active should use only the connection port - 1 as the data port ? Didn't check, but I would guess so.
Why would u need more than one anyway ? Your users need to do 2 things at the same time on your FTP ?
(you're talking firewalled client, not server eh ?)
|
|
|
06-07-2004, 10:46 AM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 231
|
Server and client actually, but doesnt really matter.
Its just most anoying/doomed to run into problems, while running ioftpd on a firewalled server. Since all transfers have to be active unlike the "usual"way where 50% pasv and 50% active is being used.
Ya cant expect every client/server application to run perfectly, always sending new pasv ports. Maybe ioftpd does this, but gl and many others dont. If the timeout of lingering ports was like 5 seconds, it wouldnt be such big problem. But the current lingering is simply too long.
So for best compatibility/least errors on transfers i think it should be manual selectable.
But yea, this been on this forum before, and i guess d1 gets bored of it :P Which is understandable :banana:
Im a ***** sometimes
|
|
|
06-07-2004, 02:25 PM
|
#23
|
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
|
Only way to control lingering, is to tweak registry. Io is performing the socket closure as suggested by Microsoft. Infact, there's recent topic about it on msnews.microsoft.com microsoft.public.win32.programmer.networks. Just look for my posts there.
|
|
|
06-07-2004, 03:40 PM
|
#24
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 50
|
Uh........
- NT service support
-> more then 1 service ?, possible adding more option to run more then 1 .exe ??
- Option to specify files that are being crc-checked
-> like zipscript by you ?
Kewl..
|
|
|
06-07-2004, 04:13 PM
|
#25
|
Senior Member
FlashFXP Beta Tester ioFTPD Scripter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 517
|
running 2 ioFTPD.exe's has always been possible, but u need 2 separate directories with different users/groups/config, eg. C:\ioFTPD1\ and C:\ioFTPD2\, and scripts must support it, when running them in the same NT user context.
|
|
|
06-07-2004, 04:30 PM
|
#26
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ADDiCT
running 2 ioFTPD.exe's has always been possible, but u need 2 separate directories with different users/groups/config, eg. C:\ioFTPD1\ and C:\ioFTPD2\, and scripts must support it, when running them in the same NT user context.
|
I was thinking about ioFTPD.exe + eggdrop.exe + whatever.exe in same service installer.
|
|
|
06-07-2004, 05:12 PM
|
#27
|
Posse Member
Ultimate Scripter ioFTPD Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,956
|
ioFTPD is a daemon, not a service installer.
Do you install apache as a service using mysql service installer ?
|
|
|
06-07-2004, 11:37 PM
|
#28
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mouton
ioFTPD is a daemon, not a service installer.
Do you install apache as a service using mysql service installer ?
|
Mouton, is a simple question of possibillity to be added ? Whats wrong with that ? I think im on the right thread and on the right forum for this, and, NO i dont use mysql, apache nor ioBanana.
- Lets end this discussion if it gonna turn to who is what ok ?
Thanks
|
|
|
06-09-2004, 05:06 PM
|
#29
|
Junior Member
ioFTPD Foundation User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 14
|
Could be just me.. but a ioFTPD GUI ?
|
|
|
06-19-2004, 05:40 PM
|
#30
|
Junior Member
ioFTPD Foundation User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4
|
DDE instead or as addition to memory sharing (or whatever it was called ^^)... DDE is so much nicer and easier to use ^^
and I didn't see it anywhere yet, I don't know how complicated it would be in C++, but in VB it's something totally easy-to-implement... would be great.
greetz,
KaZaR
btw: First post
btw2: Still wating for my registration-mail I sent wednesday ;D
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 PM.
|