Go Back   FlashFXP Forums > > > >

ioFTPD General New releases, comments, questions regarding the latest version of ioFTPD.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-31-2003, 06:45 AM   #1
darkone
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User
ioFTPD Administrator
 
darkone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
Default Apache vs ioFTPD :p

I just did some sieging for fun (debian; apt-get install siege-ssl, siege -u http://address.to.siege/)

ioFTPD (p4 1800):

Transactions: 19625 hits
Availability: 100.00 %
Elapsed time: 19.45 secs
Data transferred: 101127625 bytes
Response time: 0.01 secs
Transaction rate: 1009.00 trans/sec
Throughput: 5199363.55 bytes/sec <<= 5mb/sec
Concurrency: 12.97
Successful transactions: 19625
Failed transactions: 0

Apache (duron 933):

Transactions: 5363 hits
Availability: 100.00 %
Elapsed time: 11.93 secs
Data transferred: 5824218 bytes
Response time: 0.03 secs
Transaction rate: 449.54 trans/sec
Throughput: 488199.32 bytes/sec <<= 500kb/sec
Concurrency: 12.45
Successful transactions: 5363
Failed transactions: 0

Not bad from ftpd, uhh?
darkone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2003, 07:13 AM   #2
Zer0Racer
Senior Member
ioFTPD Scripter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 703
Default

Does CPU performance play any part in this?
Zer0Racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2003, 03:58 AM   #3
GOD-EMPEROR
Member
ioFTPD Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 42
Default

I would imagine the mem bw plays a bigger role than raw cpu for raw http gets.... if the page was dynamically created from various sources like database and long parameters to decipher that might be another story

btw duron's are supposed to be multiples of 50
GOD-EMPEROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2003, 05:31 AM   #4
Zer0Racer
Senior Member
ioFTPD Scripter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 703
Default

Then let's assume the Duron uses SDRAM and the P4 DDR. SDRAM CL2 on crappy VIA chipset can handle ~1000MB data per second and regular DDR memory also on VIA chipset can easily handle 2000MB/s (SiSoft Sandra mem benchmark).

Then let's assume performance in the test above is very memory speed dependent - we double the Apache values. ioFTPD would still have twice the amount of transactions, five times higher throughput and still higher transaction rate.

Conclusion: ioFTPD is still faster.
Zer0Racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2003, 08:30 AM   #5
darkone
Disabled
FlashFXP Registered User
ioFTPD Administrator
 
darkone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,230
Default

pages were static, so memory speed is irrelevant... I'm sure that figures were completely different on apache2, which uses threaded model. Afak amd cpus have stronger integer performance, so cpu speed difference isn't that great. Anyways, no matter how you put it; 1000 connections per second, is a lot
darkone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
19.45, ioftpd, secs, time, transferred

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Command Line Options Uradox General Discussion 4 09-02-2004 05:43 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.

Parts of this site powered by vBulletin Mods & Addons from DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Details)