Go Back   FlashFXP Forums > > > >

ioFTPD General New releases, comments, questions regarding the latest version of ioFTPD.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 4.40 average. Display Modes
Old 01-04-2012, 05:11 PM   #166
o_dog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 692
Default

it shoudln't be. I could probably modify the return codes if it's needed. But a crc error is not really an error. It means the file is corrupt, that the transfer failed or that it's incomplete on source.


CRC errors can be ioNiNJAS fault since it compares it with the sfv file. And alot of people jsut have to screw things up by leaving crap in there thats not needed.
__________________
ioNiNJA
o_dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 06:18 AM   #167
Tuffal_Simon
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1
Default




Apr 26, 2011 – UPDATE: v7.7.2 (it must be .2) appears really stable. So far nobody has reported any crashes and the few sites I can see all have nice uptimes. 5 years has passed - is ioFTPD still worth using ?? - Aug 12, 2011 ioFTPD leech issue? - Ap
Tuffal_Simon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 03:45 AM   #168
Yil
Too much time...
FlashFXP Beta Tester
ioFTPD Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,194
Default

A quick update. I started playing with C# and WPF a bit around Christmas as I wanted to learn the language. I haven't done a lot with it yet, but I can see why people find it easy to use. Figuring I knew enough I decided to write the C# shared memory library for the scripters out there. Unfortunately I found out that there are a lot of subtle details C# just glosses over if you are only writing pure managed code... I think I've got a handle on things now as the library can make simple shared memory requests to the server, but I've still got to implement all the possible calls and do a lot of cleanup though. I'm also trying to make the API an interface so in the future you could connect to the server over an FTP login and perform the same operations which would allow remote administration. Something similar to how ioGUI offers you the option of how to communicate with the server now.

After the C# shared memory library exposes the current functionality I'll probably go ahead and implement a whole lot more functions and/or an entirely new interface under the covers to help catch it up to functionality that TCL currently has access to. I believe things like path resolving, querying the active mountfile, etc are all things that a script is likely to need to do and I think it's better to have the server do it than each scripter write their own routines to try and mimic the server, parse server config files, etc...
Yil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 05:06 AM   #169
ArtX
Senior Member
FlashFXP Beta Tester
ioFTPD Foundation User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 301
Default

so 2012 is going to be the year of ioftpd v8?
ArtX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2012, 11:54 AM   #170
Ullman
Junior Member
FlashFXP Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 7
Default

Is there a list of clients that are allowed to connect to the ioFTPD server or what could be the cause of getting the following in my Error.log-file:

Quote:
Rejected unmatched client 70.62.#.#
I've searched the forum and found a thread for the ioFTPD v6.3.5 Beta release but it didn't turn up much info on what was the exact cause or how it was solved.

I myself use FlashFXP and another user also uses FlashFXP but the one who keeps getting the rejected entry uses FileZilla (since it's free). Is there a certain way an ftp-client should connect to ioFTPD or?

I've got the log printout from the user with FileZilla and it is as follows:

Quote:
Status: Connecting to 1.2.3.4:9000...

Status: Connection established, waiting for welcome message...

Error: Could not connect to server
Cheers!

Last edited by Yil; 01-31-2012 at 03:02 PM.
Ullman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2012, 12:42 AM   #171
Yil
Too much time...
FlashFXP Beta Tester
ioFTPD Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,194
Default

Ullman: You have enabled the 'Reject_Unknown_Ips' option in the .ini file and the IP/hostname of the user trying to connect doesn't match ANY hostmask across ALL the users so the server won't talk to him.

You can probably verify this using the 'site findip <IP>' and then 'site findip <hostname>' option which won't return any matching user hostmasks.

Of course the solution is simple, just add a new hostmask to the user
Yil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2012, 05:17 AM   #172
Ullman
Junior Member
FlashFXP Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 7
Default

Yil: I did use the site findip 70.62.254.254 to see all users that has that IP range and the only user that came up was the one who couldn't connect

I did add the following IP to that user: *@70.62.*.* but it didn't seem to solve the problem right away

Just thinking out loud is there a delay for when I update a users profile for instance adding a new IP to a user and he/she can't connect right away? Could ioftpd cache all the user profiles and then update the cache after a while or is it done instantly? Or does it write the changes to that users profile and then when they try to connect it checks the user profile?

Many thoughts hehe hope you could follow what I was thinking otherwise I guess I'll have to explain a bit better

Cheers!
Ullman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2012, 03:05 PM   #173
Yil
Too much time...
FlashFXP Beta Tester
ioFTPD Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,194
Default

That's weird. Updates are applied immediately so that shouldn't be it. Try a 'site rehash' which should rebuild everything. If that fails you could also try restarting the server just to see if that fixes things...

On the other hand, make sure you aren't chasing two different problems. Check 'site bans list' to make sure the user hasn't auto-banned themselves.

Double check that the logfile is reporting the same rejected IP address just in case their IP changed on them as well.
Yil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2012, 05:24 PM   #174
Ullman
Junior Member
FlashFXP Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 7
Default

Unfortunately their IP hasn't changed between connects, and no user has been banned...

Yes the changes should be auto-updated, but thats whats strange since it happened today to another user who had a new IP I added the new IP but the user had to wait around 5-6 minutes before they could connect successfully.

I did a site config rehash but might have to try that site rehash instead

Haven't tested to restart the server, but I have to wait and see if I stumble upon another IP change if that might fix the problem

Cheers!
Ullman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 08:18 AM   #175
o_dog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 692
Default

nevermind. New settign i forgot to add on update
__________________
ioNiNJA

Last edited by o_dog; 02-24-2012 at 08:24 AM.
o_dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012, 04:07 PM   #176
Yil
Too much time...
FlashFXP Beta Tester
ioFTPD Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,194
Default

Hmm, not sure when it happened, but it appears that I broke dynamic DNS hostname supports in user hostmasks. Thus things like :ident@name.no-ip.org won't work for the moment. I guess nobody is using this feature which I believe is unique to ioFTPD. I think it's pretty handy in those rare cases where users have a crazy range of IPs they could be assigned.
Yil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2012, 07:30 AM   #177
mr.babek
Member
FlashFXP Beta Tester
ioFTPD Foundation User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 82
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yil View Post
Hmm, not sure when it happened, but it appears that I broke dynamic DNS hostname supports in user hostmasks. Thus things like :ident@name.no-ip.org won't work for the moment. I guess nobody is using this feature which I believe is unique to ioFTPD. I think it's pretty handy in those rare cases where users have a crazy range of IPs they could be assigned.
Some of my users requested to add their ip by dns , sinces it didnt work I guessed it wasn't implemented at all
__________________
Current setup:

MS Windows Storage Server 2012R2, ioFTPD 7.7.3, ioNinja, nxTools
mr.babek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2012, 06:33 PM   #178
Yil
Too much time...
FlashFXP Beta Tester
ioFTPD Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,194
Default

o_dog: Testing shows another issue that will be of interest to scripters. It's starting to look like a script that runs longer than the idle timeout on a non-exempt user will end up returning a script failure message and be disconnected when the script finally finishes. This probably only matters for things like 'site rescan all' on a big directory since the default idle timeout of 6 minutes is pretty long for a script to be running. Idle exempt users won't trigger this which is probably why I never noticed it before I've duplicated the result, but haven't confirmed the exact problem but thought I'd mention it so you can make sure you test your script with an idle exempt user since this wouldn't be a bug in your script that you need to find.
Yil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2012, 05:08 PM   #179
o_dog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 692
Default

nah, if you run it with a master account and your client does not disconnect it shouldn't stop the script as long as it sends something to ioftpd every now and then.
__________________
ioNiNJA
o_dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2012, 12:34 PM   #180
mr-b
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 20
Default

Yil, is there any way to get around MAX_PATH? I am hitting directory/filename length limits and it's very annoying. Does ioFTPD need to abide by the limits of the Windows API cuz NTFS can support longer? Maybe it is the TCL scripts that are truely limited, I haven't tested without them.
mr-b is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bug, code, directory, release, user

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 PM.

Parts of this site powered by vBulletin Mods & Addons from DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Details)