Log in

View Full Version : FlashFXP does not call home


bigstar
05-28-2002, 05:36 AM
There have been a lot of rumors lately that FlashFXP calls home, reports usage, etc, this is entirely not true. We value your privacy and would never do anything like that. These rumors are completely false. We have the deepest repect for our customers.

For whatever reason these people are trying to make us look bad. These comments have been appearing everywhere, Download sites, message boards, chat rooms. I would be lying to you if I said it wasn't effecting sales, It's hurting our sales, If it continues it may ruin us. We need your support to make it through this.

I would like to make it clear that the registered version offers LiveUpdate which keeps the user up to date on the latest versions. This feature is provided as a benefit to the user. After registration it immediately performs an update to insure you are using the latest version. We release so many versions that it helps us tremendously if the user is using the latest version as soon as they've registered. Downloading and installing the update is completely optional.

LiveUpdate can be disabled, it's totally up to the user whether or not they want to check for newer versions.

When a LiveUpdate is performed no personal information is transmitted. A hash of your registration key is sent to validate that you are in fact using a registered version.

If you're still not satisfied you could always run a packet sniffer, A packet sniffer shows all of the data being sent to/from your machine.

Don't know where to find a packet sniffer, Below are some links.

AnalogX PacketMon (http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/network/pmon.htm)

Iris Network Traffic Analyzer (http://www.eeye.com/html/Products/Iris/)

Ethereal (http://www.ethereal.com/)

WinDump (http://windump.polito.it/)

LoKiDarkGod
05-28-2002, 07:13 PM
First of all, let me say I AM a registered user.. I bought yer product cause I used it for so long and I believed it was worth the price, but previously I had used copies from questionable sources.. I was pointed to this thread by another thread listed under the public beta testing section and after reading this I feel I must reply.

You say that FlashFXP does NOT call home, that it is merely a function of liveupdate, but in my previous versions I did notice that when you install a new version/key it does contact your server, liveupdate or otherwise, as soon as you run the program. And with my previous version usage it does tell you that you are using an invalid key. There were no warnings that it was performing this update, or that it was "calling home" for any reason. This lead to people finding other ways of getting around this protection scheme, as I'm sure you are aware of, like setting the liveupdate settings to invalid DNS entries, etc.

Now i'm not validating trying to bypass the protection you may or may not have included in your software, like I said, I now legally own my copy. But I couldn't go on reading these threads saying FlashFXP doesn't call home, when obviously it does, and checks registration, wether for legit purposes or not.

Also, one last thing. You stated that the LiveUpdate sends a Hash of the registration in order to process and update the software, I think this is a bad idea. This then invalidates trial users legitly updating the software they are testing.

I purchased your software for the simple fact that I believed it was worth the purchase price. And I can tell you flat out, it took more then 30 days for me to decide that. I used FlashFXP for months, through several different versions, before I finally decided it was indeed worth the purchase.

Just my 2 cents...

bigstar
05-29-2002, 12:02 AM
The only time it automatically checks for a newer version is when you first enter your registration key, Updating to a newer version does not force a LiveUpdate. Also while a LiveUpdate is being performed you see it happening on your screen.

Also, one last thing. You stated that the LiveUpdate sends a Hash of the registration in order to process and update the software, I think this is a bad idea. This then invalidates trial users legitly updating the software they are testing. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by this, LiveUpdate is only available in the registered version and is never performed in the trial version.

When a LiveUpdate is performed it's fully disclosed to the user. LiveUpdate is mentioned both in our privacy policy and our license agreement.

http://www.flashfxp.com/privacy.php

We understand that it make take longer than 30-days of trial usage to determine if FlashFXP is right for you, and that is why FlashFXP remains fully functional even after 30-days.

NathanO
06-07-2002, 04:56 AM
"If it continues it may ruin us."

Sh!t man, your scaring me. ( Yes I am a registered user. And a very happy one, it was a great purchase )

I also 'tried' out FlashFXP for a while before I bought it, I was sick of not always having a valid key ! So yes, the checking to see if a key is valid does work, and encourages purchase.

Thanks for great software ! (and support)

bigstar
06-07-2002, 10:03 AM
My intent wasn't to scare anyone, but I felt this was something everyone should be aware of.

Joker
07-01-2002, 01:13 PM
there is an eazy way of making this kind of rumors useless.
release the code :)

bigstar
07-01-2002, 04:31 PM
That's not a practical solution, If people can't take my word then they can do their own research. You don't need the source code, Just a packet sniffer.

LamBras
07-02-2002, 02:50 AM
Releasing source code would'nt do any good here IMHO.
The morons spreading those made up rumours are probably incapable of reading source code... but they can l33ch w4r3z, all right? :rolleyes:

I have tried and registered 4 ftp clients (bullet proof, cute ftp, to name the two most known) until I found out that flashfxp is the only one that fits my needs for perfomance and features.

Best regards
Bjoern, registered user of flashfxp

oxygene
07-02-2002, 05:31 PM
Releasing the sources would not be very smart from bigstars point of view... ;)

DYN_DaTa
07-03-2002, 03:58 AM
Originally posted by Joker
there is an eazy way of making this kind of rumors useless.
release the code :)


mmm, i'm starting to believe that those kind of comments and the spread of false rumours are coming from people related with another ftp clients... because it cannot exist as much stupidity in this world... too much envies... :cool:

floris
07-03-2002, 09:30 AM
No matter what the case is, if someone downloads a 'warez' version of this program, and their whole computer gets registered, and then complain about their privacy .. the moment they installed the product, they no longer had the rights to any privacy (in my eyes).

It is a shame that 'rumours' or rather incorrect information about a product is spread to ruin a possible great company. I just purchased the product, because I tried it out and liked it. I won't purchase a product just because I heard some third party review. I wouldn't even NOT buy a product just because someone said 'They might not be cool'.

People should use their brain, and not their warez friends when they purchase it. I am happy that we had an official reply from the developer, which gives me the idea that they care about their product and would like to share correct information with us about it.

DYN_DaTa
07-03-2002, 12:59 PM
Originally posted by floris
People should use their brain...


Nah, the problem it's that some childs come to this forum and post some stupid & dumb sthings like "a rumour that blah blah blah" don't have a brain or they don't know how to use it... and if they have one they don't know WHAT is a firewall or a packet sniffer... too lazy, too ignorant and too inmature.

floris
07-03-2002, 01:35 PM
Originally posted by DYN_DaTa



Nah, the problem it's that some childs come to this forum and post some stupid & dumb sthings like "a rumour that blah blah blah" don't have a brain or they don't know how to use it... and if they have one they don't know WHAT is a firewall or a packet sniffer... too lazy, too ignorant and too inmature.
If user used their brain, they instead of just assume something that they think it is, they would have asked, what is a packet sniffer then? So they could learn. Anyway. I am lazy too :) Just hopefully not acting as immature as they are. (im 25, so I shouldn't be).

I have been using FFXP for a few hours now, and I am happy! up/downloading etc on my sites goes so much better & quicker and cleaner. Error handling is great too. Worth its money.

DYN_DaTa
07-03-2002, 01:49 PM
They never would ask first, they prefer to spread false rumours to harm the reputation of the program and author. When i talked about inmaturity i was referring to those childs who are using FlashFXP (a pìrated copy most of them) and have the balls to post in the official FlashFXP forum posts about FALSE spyware-related rumours.

They're too lazy cause they CAN'T spend 2 minutes of their lives to read the Privacy Policy and a well explained post of the developer explaining the TRUTH of all of this. I'm tired of all those pathetic childs... i'm very tired..

bjay125
07-05-2002, 08:45 PM
First of all, I am a registered user, and I have found flash to be the best FTP client available, which is why I purchased a key.

But, let's look at this closely -- when I enter a key, it automatically connects to the server, and determines if I have a valid key, and if I need an update. So if someone at flashfxp were to look at the logs, they would have my IP address, my key, and the version I am using. This most definitely fits the definition of "phoning home". Say what you will, this IS phoning home. Whether this procedure is outlined in the privacy statement or elsewhere, it IS phoning home.

With that being said, I see nothing wrong with this procedure for valid users. Actually I personally like it. But I can see why people who are concerned with privacy may not like this. And of course it helps thwart the warezer, which was probably its primary purpose in the first place.

I certainly hope flash doesn't fold. I love the program. Like I said, I don't have any problems with it phoning home, but let's get real - saying it doesn't phone home is simply a lie.

Linkster
07-06-2002, 01:11 AM
once again, i disagree with you bjay125. when you place an order for flashfxp, your ip is logged, and even personal information like name is taken. when liveupdate is run (again this happens only if you have registered flashfxp), your ip is of course logged (standard for any web site) and a hash of your key is sent to validate. No other information is ever sent. the term "phoning home" is synonymous with the very illegal practices that Blizzard was attacked for and had to stop. Actually sending extra information about you and your computer (that was not ever volunteered) to their systems. So i DON'T like FlashFXP being labeled as phoning home when it only sends a single piece of information that we generated in the first place and that is useless to anyone packet snooping. The ONLY people that complain about these things are those that continue to use pirated copies, and who in my opinion (because of violating a license agreement) have also lost any privelege of privacy. If it were up to me, i would post every single ip address that has tried to liveupdate with a verified pirated code (there are tens of thousands of them too).

Jesper
07-07-2002, 05:22 AM
FlaxhFXP version 2 may send your sites.dat to spa.org (anti-warez group) - http://forum.flashfxp.com/showthread.php?threadid=1076 (or does it?, it's your call.).

Well Ill take this as being waaaaaaaaaaayyy out of proportions?? right ??
I got it from an 3rd party source, who got it from a 4th and so on and so on :D

And about the privacy, wheater FFXP calls home or NOT,
Its a matter of how you expresses it.
How can some be offended, by FFXP sends a few data home to make sure youre 100% updated?
Along as it just sends IP, name and key, and verison number, its all fine.
Did those people ever try windows update or any other liveupdate app ?? they would prolly have noticed that all Liveupdaters works the same way.

As for illegal copies of FFXP, why even bother, the program is very cheap and 100% worth the price.

If this is just false rumours spread by warez freaks that just cant make proper cracks, or other FTP developers, that cant compare with FFXP, then there is only 2 things to say
1: Bigstar ROCK ON :)
2: FlashFXP beats them all



ps guys youre IP is also logged when you posts on the MSGBoard :eek:

TSx
07-08-2002, 02:01 AM
There is nothing in the licence agreement that says flash fxp may take your sites.dat file & send it "home" if it did do that & the user didint know about it CEDSoft would be sued to hell.

They know it & all of you should know it

ITS JUST A RUMOR!!!!!

1 Question thou

who in my opinion (because of violating a license agreement) have also lost any privelege of privacy.

Since when is privacy a privlege?

blackwar
07-08-2002, 04:03 AM
Originally posted by TSx

Since when is privacy a privlege?

hehe, good point
privacy is a right my friends :rolleyes:

Blackwar

Dutchman
07-08-2002, 05:25 AM
well let's put my word in too...

first of all

crackers and hackers they ain't gonna do this what you call "phoning home"for them just cause they kniow there will be cracks available always for every program that is released and ain't a little game...
I mean they will now just put a crack on it so that It isn't gonna call home you put in the registration of an invalid user than it will try to connect ohwohw it can't cause it's cracked...

But I think they do need a protection cause come on this program will be used too download from illegal pages and will be used to upload to pubs and this kind of illegal things so they need a good protection otherwise 10000 will use the program and 10 users are registered...

and well I don't think they will send information to an anti warez group otherwise they will get for court cause it's simply taking others privacy and that's illegal but they can validate keys and let there program work wrong if there's an illegal key and I think that's there right of every maker nobody wants to make a program just to let it be cracked...

and for some stupid people here NO i don't read entire user agreements and so on.... come on for every program I install I read the entire agreement? Noppe sorry...


I think if they put this kind of safety control in there software they should tell every user and not in the useragreement but everywhere... an apart scheme just before you install it or something...

Greetz Dutchman

floris
07-08-2002, 06:19 AM
Privacy a policy ? a right ? a priveledge ?

The matter of the fact is, you do not wish to have the mailman read your personal mail, just to see if it is appropiate for your kids to read, before putting it in your mail box. The matter of the fact is, I am alright with him checking where it is from and where it is for. So he can make the appropiate decision. This goes for negotiation between the client and the server, which is the case here. The program needs to validate a key and/or client version. It doesn't read the inside of the envoloppe, it doesn't see what you have uploaded/downloaded and/or which sites you can access. There is what the privacy is about. If you are on the internet, your host address isn't private and has nothing to do with privacy. It is a public host address.

Everybody can stop crapping about something they have no idea about and the mod should just close the thread. The information has been posted several times and even gave some extra confirmation on the case. If you don't like it, stop using it.

Linkster
07-08-2002, 11:22 AM
very well said floris. thread closed