suggestion: queue split

[temp123456]

something like selecting a few queue entry, right click on them, issue some command, and the selected entries are opened in a new flashfxp instance.
(autostarting these new downloads or keeping the splitted queue entries in the original queue and so on.. are preferably optional)
would be a nice addition to the features, specially if u don't plan to introduce multithreaded downloads.

[Shark]

Why not just save the current queue, open a new instance, load that saved queue.

Then remove the items which you will download from queue 1, and remove the ones from queue 2.

Thats how I used to do it.. let me know if that doesn't make sense.

[Bald0z]

There is no need to save the queue, because the actually running queues are already available in the FlashFXP dir.
And if you wish to download , for example, 2 files at a time, load the SAME queue twice and set the auto skip for "smaller", "same" and "bigger" files (File Exists Rule).

[temp123456]

>Why not just save the current queue, open a new instance, load that saved queue.
>Then remove the items which you will download from queue 1, and remove the ones from queue 2.

That is exactly the reason why i made this suggestion in the first place. I'm goddamn too lazy to go through such a procedure if it can be issued in a simple rigt click command. (of course it makes sense, sometime i use that method so i'm speaking of experience too)

>There is no need to save the queue, because the actually running queues are already available in the FlashFXP dir blah blah blah etc etc.

A slightly better procedure as in the above stated (at least in my oppinion). but it doesn't beat my one click suggestion if im such a lazy ******* as usually. and i also cannot forfeit such an important feature for me as the auto resume.

the other reason why i suggested is to see whether there are other ppl who also think that this "shortcut function" would serve them good too cuz a suggestion cannot be successfully made/applied if only i benefit from it. (of course the applied thing is not my decision)

[Shark]

Well as I was trying to say.. there is no need in adding an option to save 2 clicks or something, insead of one...

So to answer your question I dont see the need to add this option when its quite easy to do already. Thanks for your suggestion.

[temp123456]

awwwwright.
no problem