I understand the aim for total performance to be as best as possible...as I strive for that performance as well.
BUT - as there always is one
When you compare a main stream solution for such tasks, the flip
side to this is not where "many" of your end users will be now,
nor anytime in the near future.
Not when the average home based site is on simple home based
solutions that are mainly based on COST. They would not use
such power. Even now at 1024 connections, that is impressive,
but overall, how many sites would even come close to that useage?
If you want ~10K - and I see your point.
BUT - another one here
Most home based and just above that (this is where the "MANY")
come into play - have to deal with others running RAIDEN.
Lets face facts here, unless the other guy changes, and we know
that will not take place...as each and every topic on this is some
how deleted on that support forum.
Maybe a poll would tell you want the end user wants, and then
you can see if it is worth the effort to either code 2 versions or
put a fix in...if this is even possible.
And then cost the versions accordingly
- power version ~10K
- home based version able to use raiden type ftpds
At least then you can cover all areas and trial it for a few months
to see if the "R" versions pick up based on such platform choice.
TW
|