Integrate FlashSFV into the Shell

[RB|Knight]

What about creating an SFV of selected files out of the context menu with FlashSFV? If i want to create a SFV, i have to start FlashSFV, search for the files i wish to add to the SFV and give a name for the SFV. When you make it possible to do this out of the context menu it is only nessecary to give the SFV's name (assuming that the path of the SFV is the same as the files that get added to the SFV)

I think it's a very good idee when you often have to create SFV's

[Shark]

As far as im aware, this topic has been discussed and it was not an idea to put SFV options into FlashFXP. FlashFXP is a FTP/FXP program and SFV related activities are to be done within the specific program (FlashSFV).

Bigstar can confirm this for me, but I wouldn't get to excited about having anything SFV related ever coded into FlashFXP.

Shark.

[MxxCon]

Shark, i think you misunderstood.

i belive what RB|Knight is asking is to add FlashSFV into explorer's r-click menu. i have a test version with this feature, but i don't use explorer so i can't tell how good it works..

[bigstar]

Actually Mxx your copy is to create a SFV when you right click on a Folder.

In order to handle multiple selected files a shell extension dll would be required. I'm not familiar with this area and I really don't have time for it right now.

[bigstar]

..

[-AJ-]

Would've been a cool feature though...

[RB|Knight]

year, would be a nice feature. And yes, i ment the Explorers r-click menu.

[RB|Knight]

I have found a SFV util which can create .SFV Files on r-click:
QuickSFV

http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Mouse/4668

with this you can select some files, r-click --> Create .SFV File --> enter the name of the .SFV File --> OK --> done

If you can add this to flashsfv it would be great. I like FlashSFV more than QuickSFV, dunno why

[oxydrine]

flashsfv 2.5 do it too :

sorry but in french ->

->Panneau de configuration
->Options des dossiers
->Types de fichiers
->Nouveau
-> extansion SFV
-> Avancés SFV Files
-> OK

et voici dans le click droit de la souris les commandes suivantes complémentaires pour SFV :

Sur la directory contenant tous tes files (genres tes files rar) tu click droit et tu obtiens Create MD5 et dessous Create SFV aussi

le file md5 ou le file sfv se contruira automatiquement avec tous les fichiers qui sont dans cette dir

plaisir @+

[MxxCon]

holy "4year old thread resurrection" batman!

[oxydrine]

lool le temps de toruver la réponse je lol bien sur

time to know answer, im laughting

[Rodrigo]

Originally Posted by oxydrine

flashsfv 2.5 do it too :

sorry but in french ->

->Panneau de configuration
->Options des dossiers
->Types de fichiers
->Nouveau
-> extansion SFV
-> Avancés SFV Files
-> OK

et voici dans le click droit de la souris les commandes suivantes complémentaires pour SFV :

Sur la directory contenant tous tes files (genres tes files rar) tu click droit et tu obtiens Create MD5 et dessous Create SFV aussi

le file md5 ou le file sfv se contruira automatiquement avec tous les fichiers qui sont dans cette dir

plaisir @+

translation:

->Control Panel
->Folder Options
->file Types
->New
-> File Extension: SFV
-> OK
-> Advanced (when the SFV extension is selected)


There you can add the programs that need to be run

For the rest i have to install it myself (and i'm at my computer @ work)

You can define actions there (you have to do this command line)

[Proxima Centauri]

If you would like to create one SFV for multiple files in a directory (including nested subdirectories) try

DVDsig

[DayCuts]

creation of subdirectory inclusive sfvs is a bad idea in my opinion, although i have had use for this in the past, i generally feel that its a bad idea to create an sfv file that is so completely unsupported by other sfv verification tools.

for recursive sfv checking try hksfv, best solution to the tediousness of creating multiple sfv files (rather than the standard-ignoring subdir inclusive form) imo is for a tool to recurse through all selected folders and create an individual sfv in each. although im not aware (have never bothered looking though) of any that exist.